News | Subscribe News

Making supply chains work for producers and consumers

 
Ethical Sourcing by Tesco

Tesco sources bananas directly from farms that operate to high ethical standards Photograph: Alamy

 

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Making supply chains work for producers and consumers” was written by Caspar van Vark, for theguardian.com on Friday 21st February 2014 07.00 UTC

Supply chains are increasingly scrutinised and expected to meet multiple objectives. Consumers want access to products at affordable prices, and retailers want to make profits.

On top of that, there’s growing recognition that supply chains also need to be fair to producers, and environmentally sound.

With supply chains stretching around the world in often long and complex forms, the challenge is about achieving transparency at every stage and sustainability for everyone involved. How do we do it?

This was the subject of a recent roundtable event hosted by the Guardian and Tesco, attended by experts from industry, research organisations and campaigning groups. It began by discussing the types of changes required if supply chains are to ever successfully address issues as wide-ranging as human rights, labour laws and climate change.

“In a lot of supply chains, this does really mean changing the way you operate,” said Giles Bolton, ethical trading director at Tesco. “We decided a few years ago that whether it’s about the environment, product quality or the way people are treated, we can’t afford to just buy through agents in the UK. We’ve changed the way we source bananas, for example. We’re big enough to have our own experts in countries to ensure suppliers operate to high ethical standards and, on average, we pay more than the Fairtrade minimum price for bananas.”

Fairtrade and other certification schemes have done valuable work in improving fairness and sustainability along value chains, but they also have limitations. Duncan Williamson, senior policy advisor at WWF UK, pointed out that there are over 65 certification schemes for seafood, of which WWF UK regards two as representing genuine sustainability, with the others being “literally the legal minimum in that country”.

And Stuart Singleton-White, senior manager of external communications for Europe and Australia at the Rainforest Alliance, suggested that we might also be seeing diminishing returns in what certification achieves.

“There’s a dynamic with larger fast-moving consumer goods brands,” he said “where they’ve got to a certain position with third-party schemes, and now feel they can maybe have a slightly lower standard that will still meet their needs and maintain trust levels, so there’s a danger that these standards now can’t really produce the change they’re presented as being able to do.”

Power imbalances

It may be that the compliance paradigm isn’t strong enough to tackle the inherent power imbalances of global supply chains. This imbalance isn’t necessarily a deliberate tactic on the part of large companies, but they are implicated in it, said Peter McAllister, executive director of the Ethical Trading Initiative.

“I don’t think companies set out to cause harm,” he said. “It’s a result of the way global supply chains work. If you want sustainable supply chains, you have to re-jig how you think. The compliance paradigm has driven some change, but it doesn’t get at the imbalances of power and the fact that buildings have been built that should never have been built, and no one cared if the workers were safe or not. It doesn’t tackle those bigger issues.”

What needs to be done then? If we can’t rely on the corporate social accountability agenda alone to drive real change, we need to go for governance, suggested Jenny Holdcroft, policy director at IndustriALL Global Union. At the national level, in developed countries, good governance is already in place. This is not so in many developing countries, which means global supply chains don’t have enough checks and balances. Multinationals have the power to lobby governments in those countries to change this, if they want to.

“There’s a real limit to what a single company can do on its own, which is why this is about governance,” said Holdcroft. “Multinationals have power, but only through their own supply chain. If you have a critical mass of brands, you can really have a voice with governments. Multinationals, because of the powerful relationships they have, can play a role in stopping suppliers repressing unionisation. It would be great to see investors rewarding companies for actively engaging with governments in supply countries to say they want a living wage that applies to everyone.”

Holdcroft pointed to the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Accord (see below) as an example of how big retailers can actually join forces to effect positive change, filling the gaps in local governance that have often allowed a “race to the bottom”, with those at the bottom paying the price.

 

Pages: 1 2

Comments are closed.

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.