Climate change | Subscribe News

5 ways to hack the planet

 
Global Warming

‘By infusing the ocean with iron filings, we could stimulate phytoplankton blooms, increasing bio-productivity and create a green carbon sink.’ Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

 

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “5 ways to hack the planet” was written by Philip Hoare, for theguardian.com on Thursday 12th September 2013 11.34 UTC

It’s been a week of doom as far as the public face of science is concerned. On Tuesday we had Sir David Attenborough’s depressing prognostications that the future is going to be worse for our children and their children (especially if we insist on producing more children in the first place).

Now the comments by the astronomer royal, Martin Rees, take the apocalyptic tone to a new level, one which resonates with his medieval title. With a Nostradamus-like gloom, he intimates it may be too late to naturally reverse the effects of climate change – and believes that radical geoengineering may be the only way we can cope with the desperate scenario. It is one which Lord Rees does not relish: “Geoengineering would be an utter political nightmare”, he acknowledges, as well as stirring up practical and ethical dilemmas we can’t begin to imagine. But that doesn’t stop us trying.

Geoengineering – planet-hacking, in other words – is another of those scientific ventures that pursues the fantastical and seeks to implement it in reality. It’s a kind of steampunk for boffins and entrepreneurs – Jules Verne gone viral. It ranges from the ostensibly practical, to the practically insane – but it reminds us that we humans have that one extraordinary superpower which might yet get us out of this fix: imagination itself.

So (every science statement begins thus nowadays), what are the ideas?

1. The giant sunshade

One of Lord Rees’s fellow astronomers, the aptly named Roger Angel, has come up with a vast sunshade to be constructed from 16tr glass discs, assembled in space, and sent into orbit using electromagnetic launchers. This has a beautiful, obvious simplicity. Angel believes that by blocking just 2% of the sun’s rays, global warming could be reduced to manageable proportions. That we could regulate the earth’s temperature, much as we do with the blinds in a sunny conservatory. All well and good – but issues of maintenance and other practicalities – asteroids, for one – cast a shadow on this mega-space umbrella.

Practicality rating: 5/10

Apocalypse rating: 3/10

Cost: 8/10

2. Iron fertilisation

This is the idea that by infusing the ocean with iron filings, we could stimulate phytoplankton blooms, increasing bio-productivity and create a green carbon sink, in the process absorbing large amounts of CO2. It may sound like a school lab experiment gone crazy, but since the 1990s, this has been one of the most favoured geoengineering techniques.

However, it completely ignores its effect on marine life. Surely one reason we’re trying to save the planet is to preserve the reasons why we liked it in the first place. And anyway, sperm whales have been doing this naturally for millennia. A recent Australian report estimated the southern ocean population of whales release enough faeces to absorb 400,000 tonnes of carbon a year. Although no-one’s proposing training huge pods of the creatures to do our dirty work. Yet.

Nevertheless, more localised environmental concerns didn’t stop Russ George of Planktos dumping 100 tonnes of iron sulphate in the Pacific last year, an act which has been accused of violating the UN’s convention on biological diversity and other international conventions that forbid dumping at sea. Good old human bureaucracy may yet stymie the wilder excesses of geoengineering. Meanwhile, other scientists claim that diatoms – photosynthetic plankton – may merely absorb the iron into their shells and sink to the sea bed, negating the intended effect.

Practicality rating: 8/10

Apocalypse rating: 6/10

Cost: 3/10

3. Seaweed farms

Proposals for giant seaweed farms work on a similar principle to iron fertilisation, and would cultivate larger, more CO2-absorbing plant forms than phytoplankton. They also sound rather more directly appealing (at least for lovers of Japanese cuisine) in that they’d have the added bonus of furnishing us with food as a byproduct.

Practicality rating: 8/10

Apocalypse rating: 2/10

Cost: 2/10

 

Pages: 1 2

Comments are closed.

Trending Posts

Jobs